Skip to content

Conversation

@guy-starkware
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@sirandreww-starkware sirandreww-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @guy-starkware)


crates/apollo_l1_provider/src/transaction_manager.rs line 95 at r1 (raw file):

                    record.state
                );
            }

use assert_ne

Code quote:

            if record.state != TransactionState::Pending {
                panic!(
                    "Transaction {tx_hash} has state {:?}. Only Pending transactions should be in \
                     the proposable index.",
                    record.state
                );
            }

Copy link
Contributor Author

@guy-starkware guy-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @sirandreww-starkware)


crates/apollo_l1_provider/src/transaction_manager.rs line 95 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, sirandreww-starkware (Andrew Luka) wrote…

use assert_ne

I think you mean assert_eq! but either way, Done.

@guy-starkware guy-starkware force-pushed the guyn/l1provider/check_tx_is_pending branch from 8a1a721 to a3efc8e Compare December 9, 2025 09:23
Copy link
Contributor

@sirandreww-starkware sirandreww-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, all discussions resolved


crates/apollo_l1_provider/src/transaction_manager.rs line 95 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, guy-starkware wrote…

I think you mean assert_eq! but either way, Done.

yes, sorry

@guy-starkware guy-starkware force-pushed the guyn/l1provider/check_tx_is_pending branch from a3efc8e to b29880f Compare December 10, 2025 12:23
@guy-starkware guy-starkware force-pushed the guyn/l1provider/improve_add_tx_logic branch from aaa8741 to 73c16c9 Compare December 10, 2025 12:23
@guy-starkware guy-starkware force-pushed the guyn/l1provider/improve_add_tx_logic branch from 73c16c9 to 897dc8e Compare December 10, 2025 13:45
@guy-starkware guy-starkware force-pushed the guyn/l1provider/check_tx_is_pending branch from b29880f to 4ed08e0 Compare December 10, 2025 13:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@ShahakShama ShahakShama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

@ShahakShama reviewed 2 of 3 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @guy-starkware)

@guy-starkware guy-starkware changed the base branch from guyn/l1provider/improve_add_tx_logic to main-v0.14.1 December 11, 2025 09:28
@guy-starkware guy-starkware force-pushed the guyn/l1provider/check_tx_is_pending branch from 4ed08e0 to 1e11f57 Compare December 11, 2025 09:28
@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Merge activity

  • Dec 11, 9:28 AM UTC: Graphite rebased this pull request, because this pull request is set to merge when ready.

@guy-starkware guy-starkware added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2025
Merged via the queue into main-v0.14.1 with commit a7908f8 Dec 11, 2025
23 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 13, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants