-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
apollo_l1_gas_price: add test for low latest L1 block number #10346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
apollo_l1_gas_price: add test for low latest L1 block number #10346
Conversation
5f5d4dd to
77f1085
Compare
976c083 to
7b71af3
Compare
7b71af3 to
e3bf1a2
Compare
77f1085 to
159b40f
Compare
e3bf1a2 to
3593658
Compare
159b40f to
2462126
Compare
3593658 to
f408e04
Compare
2462126 to
772a4b0
Compare
f408e04 to
7c809c5
Compare
772a4b0 to
960a899
Compare
ShahakShama
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ShahakShama reviewed 2 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 2 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @guy-starkware)
a discussion (no related file):
Same comments as previous PR
a discussion (no related file):
I think we should extract this logic to a common place
ShahakShama
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 2 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @guy-starkware)
a discussion (no related file):
Previously, ShahakShama wrote…
I think we should extract this logic to a common place
Something like finality wrapper on the base layer
guy-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 2 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @ShahakShama)
a discussion (no related file):
Previously, ShahakShama wrote…
Something like finality wrapper on the base layer
Are you sure you want to add a whole other wrapper on top of the base layer (to which we are already adding a wrapper) just to encapsulate a checked_sub and an error variant?
guy-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 2 of 3 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @ShahakShama)
a discussion (no related file):
Previously, ShahakShama wrote…
Same comments as previous PR
Done.
960a899 to
1990af4
Compare
7c809c5 to
92e1316
Compare
ShahakShama
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ShahakShama reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @guy-starkware)
guy-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@guy-starkware reviewed 1 of 3 files at r1, 2 of 2 files at r2, 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @guy-starkware)

No description provided.